
I've tried to use constraint in this blog; while I'm willing to comment on political matters, I prefer to visit less controversial topics. However, the latest bit of legislative chicanery to emerge from the Democratic Congress has so piqued me that I feel compelled to comment. The so-called supplemental funding bill passed by the House and Senate is such an outrageous affront to the common-sense of the voter as to beggar belief.
The Democrats rode into town on a tidal wave of frustration over government largesse and corruption scandals. No one was as frustrated with what the Republican majority had become as me. The GOP deserved to lose. They deserve to be discontent. They deserve to be sweating 2008. However, the Dems believe that they rode into town as a posse on white steeds ready to stand up for Justice and the American way. Instead they are standing up for foolishness and the French Ideal.
President Bush has requested funding in the neighborhood of $100 billion for the war efforts in Afghanistan and Iraq. The Democrats took this request and sprang into action. The action mostly entailed acrobatic contortions that would make any yoga master proud. Unable to unify their caucus behind any coherent position, they instead set about to slice down the middle and create the worst piece of legislation to see the light of day since Mrs. Bill Clinton proposed socializing our health system. OK, maybe it is simply the worst legislation since the last farm bill. In any event it is atrocious.
In order to win the slimmest majority possible in the House of Representatives, and a mere plurality in the Senate, Democrat leadership had to load in some $40 billion in absurd pork to literally buy the votes of reluctant members of their majority. The resulting legislation calls for funding the troops, funding peanut storage and other pork give-aways, and requiring our troops to retreat by March 2008. In a display which we can only imagine was meant to seem indignant, the corpse-like Harry Reid insisted that "not another drop of American blood should be spilt in Iraq." Wow, so we need to devote another year to a hopeless cause that isn't worth fighting for. Not only has everyone who has fought, died, or been injured to date done so in vane, so will the poor thousands of souls who do so in the next year!
The duplicity of this act is impossible to ignore. The war is lost, but we will fund it. No one should die for this cause, but we'll let them go on dying for another year or so. Democrats will stop spending on pork, unless its needed to buy votes. Democrats will end corruption, unless your vote is for purchase.
The Democrats have taken little more than 2 months to prove their moral bankruptcy in governance. Given the choice between duplicitous Democrats who try to have their cake and eat it too, and the French who can be counted on for taking the position of surrender, I'll take the Frogs. At least they are unapologetic for where they stand, and what they believe in.
For more detail on my views on the Iraq War, see my article here
